Bitcoin Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Bitcoin crypto-currency enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Read title.

Creating a soft of self sustainability if you will. It might not be possible?

share|improve this question
Short answer: not by a long shot. – ThePiachu Oct 28 '12 at 18:20
Also related -… – ThePiachu Oct 28 '12 at 18:21
Short nitpick: obviously not. If it did, everyone would do that, and the prices and difficulty would auto-adjust accordingly. – o0'. Feb 8 '13 at 18:49
Surely the compute costs would rule it out anyhow? – Lloyd Feb 9 '13 at 0:24

AWS is rental of server instances. Servers without GPUs. Bitcoin is not cost effective when mining using CPUs, so nobody has done that analysis for nearly two years because its an obvious money loser and becomes a worse option with each passing day of rising difficulty.

Now EC2 (compute cluster) does use GPUs but NVidia GPUs which don't perform at a fraction of the level of AMD GPUs for the specific purpose of Bitcoin mining. Although it was not analyzed recently, a calculation from a while ago provides numbers in the right ballpark, if not better than they would be today. In that study costs you more than twenty dollars of EC2 charges to earn one dollar of bitcoins.

Once ASICs ship that difference will increase possibly by an order of magnitude.

share|improve this answer

Here its explained at best, that it is NOT profitable even on the GPU servers ;)

share|improve this answer
That post is pretty old though. Exchange rates were different then. – DuckMaestro Apr 14 '13 at 8:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.