Timeline for With Ripple, how is base fee (transaction fee) calculated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2020 at 7:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 12, 2020 at 3:04 | |||||
| Jun 3, 2013 at 20:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBitcoin/status/341646084390658049 | ||
| May 1, 2013 at 21:28 | comment | added | Manish | @eMansipater Thanks, I really appreciate the work you put into the site. I have learnt a lot from it for sure. | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 10:18 | comment | added | eMansipater | "point me to one question"--it's not really about that, more about continually improving the quality of the site. One weird thing for people to wrap their heads around with Stack Exchange sites is that even an obscure question will often be used by 50 people who later visit, and more than 20,000 people for a really good one. So the real trick to creating a good Stack Exchange site is working to make questions and answers 20,000 times better than they "need" to be. That's what people like me are always on about--the 20,000 other people who could benefit from an improvement. | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 8:57 | comment | added | Manish | @eMansipater Frankly, I don't know what you're talking about. If you can point me to one question I posted about Ripple in those few minutes that didn't meet the quality standards of this site, then I'll admit you have a point. If the documentation already contained the answer, then I wouldn't be asking the question. "No real problem." OK, case closed! | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 18:46 | comment | added | eMansipater | (You'll note that although David Schwartz was able to keep up with basic answers he didn't really have time to answer all the questions in depth.) Stack Exchange shines best when someone can take a few specific questions and answer them so effectively that anyone in the future of the internet would prefer that answer to any other treatment of the question. When questions are getting fired off too fast, it's hard for the experts to provide that level of detail and quality. That's all. | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 18:44 | comment | added | eMansipater | no real problem. Sometimes flooding a lot of questions is an indicator that someone doesn't quite get how to use Stack Exchange so I was curious where the questions were coming from. Would you say that the sorts of things you were asking about are missing holes in the existing Ripple documentation, or more just that you were using this as a way to kind of get Ripple into your head? Generally Stack Exchange works well for individual answers where someone will take the time to give an an-depth answer. With the rapid fire style you might have better luck on the Ripple forums. | |
| Apr 27, 2013 at 22:41 | vote | accept | Manish | ||
| Apr 27, 2013 at 22:40 | comment | added | Manish | @eMansipater Yes, sir, you may ask, and I can tell you that I was reading the specs and I posted the questions as they popped into my head. Is that bad form? I could just write down my questions in a text editor and post them at intervals of an hour or two, if that's better. I certainly didn't mean to "flood" anything. | |
| Apr 26, 2013 at 9:05 | answer | added | David Schwartz | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 26, 2013 at 8:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 26, 2013 at 17:45 | |||||
| Apr 26, 2013 at 8:39 | comment | added | eMansipater | Manish, you're flooding a lot of Ripple questions onto here at a higher rate than people can vote on them or answer. Can I ask why? | |
| Apr 26, 2013 at 8:35 | history | edited | Stephen Gornick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Ripple specific.
|
| Apr 26, 2013 at 2:57 | history | asked | Manish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |