Timeline for Why is my target different from a miner?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2021 at 18:05 | vote | accept | bot | ||
| Jun 29, 2021 at 18:07 | answer | added | bot | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 20, 2021 at 19:35 | comment | added | bot | When the pool sends a work, it contains the "nbits" value which, in theory, should be used in block header, so I used it. The work also contains the mining difficulty, which I set to "8", but I don't know how I should use it. I asked this question because I don't know why cpuminer target is easier than mine, so probably I did something wrong and I want to know what. | |
| Jun 20, 2021 at 16:00 | comment | added | Pieter Wuille | Are you talking about the block's "nbits" value, because that refers to the network-wide difficulty. Perhaps the other thing you see is the pool's share difficulty? | |
| Jun 20, 2021 at 15:34 | history | edited | bot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 252 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2021 at 15:28 | comment | added | bot | Ops, difficulty 8* | |
| Jun 20, 2021 at 15:10 | comment | added | bot | Both are using the same stratum pool with the same difficulty (16). I also think cpuminer target is always the same for this difficulty, idk if there is another formula to calculate the target by difficulty number. | |
| Jun 19, 2021 at 20:53 | history | edited | Murch♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 19, 2021 at 20:48 | comment | added | RedGrittyBrick | Is one using testnet and the other using mainnet? | |
| Jun 19, 2021 at 19:08 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 19, 2021 at 20:35 | |||||
| Jun 19, 2021 at 19:05 | history | asked | bot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |