Timeline for Can Bitcoin save the U.S. Post Office
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2014 at 15:56 | comment | added | elixenide | @NateEldredge You're right about the money orders. My point is that the legal objections exist and are real, not that I think there's much chance they would actually prevent the PO from going forward with this idea. I think the constitutional objections are valid and that the same logic means that the PO has no business selling money orders, either. That said, obviously the PO does sell money orders, so anyone bringing a legal challenge to this proposal would have a tough row to hoe in Congress and the courts. | |
| Feb 8, 2014 at 15:28 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | The postal service already brokers lots of financial transactions, thanks to its money order product. So I don't see constitutional obstructions to them entering this market. | |
| Feb 8, 2014 at 6:38 | vote | accept | Tom Stickel | ||
| Feb 8, 2014 at 6:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 8, 2014 at 22:11 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2014 at 5:55 | history | answered | elixenide | CC BY-SA 3.0 |