Timeline for Could an old, unconfirmed transaction fail to be processed because it is no longer deemed to have enough fees
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 22, 2014 at 10:24 | vote | accept | Phil Dann Ward | ||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 19:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBitcoin/status/447100096086556672 | ||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 18:28 | vote | accept | Phil Dann Ward | ||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 18:28 | |||||
| Mar 21, 2014 at 18:20 | answer | added | njaard | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 15:29 | comment | added | Luca Matteis | No since the signature also signs the outputs (which is how the fee is derived) | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 13:17 | comment | added | Phil Dann Ward | Is there any way to increase the fees on an already signed transaction? | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 13:01 | history | asked | Phil Dann Ward | CC BY-SA 3.0 |