Timeline for Is centralization in the Lightning network inevitable? Why (not)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2020 at 18:25 | history | edited | Murch♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 18, 2017 at 1:54 | answer | added | B T | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 7:52 | comment | added | Murch♦ | @NickODell There is some merit to this assessment, but luckily this question can just remain open and be updated with future information! :) | |
| Jun 20, 2016 at 14:08 | vote | accept | Murch♦ | ||
| Apr 15, 2016 at 9:06 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBitcoin/status/720901136597782528 | ||
| Apr 15, 2016 at 3:55 | comment | added | Nick ODell | Frankly, I think we're like blind men describing an elephant. If the routing protocol hasn't been specified yet, we can't say whether the protocol as a whole is inherently X. | |
| Apr 15, 2016 at 2:02 | answer | added | linhares | timeline score: -3 | |
| Apr 14, 2016 at 23:50 | answer | added | David A. Harding | timeline score: 17 | |
| Apr 14, 2016 at 19:53 | history | asked | Murch♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |