Timeline for Choosing between blocks with chain same work- why pick the first received?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2016 at 15:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBitcoin/status/796018048549421056 | ||
Nov 7, 2016 at 7:24 | answer | added | kanu | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 5, 2016 at 8:28 | answer | added | Murch♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 5, 2016 at 7:34 | history | edited | kanu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
Nov 3, 2016 at 5:52 | answer | added | rny | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 3:41 | comment | added | Nick ODell | Ah, that sounds like it's not a duplicate. My apologies. | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 3:39 | history | reopened | Nick ODell | ||
Nov 3, 2016 at 0:02 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 3, 2016 at 3:39 | |||||
Nov 2, 2016 at 23:46 | comment | added | kanu | Thanks, but that was my real question- why pick the one they received first, or by random? Let's say one block has no transactions but was received first, and another with the same work has many transactions was received later. Why not pick the latter? | |
Nov 2, 2016 at 23:43 | history | edited | kanu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed question to my actual doubt- why break ties randomly?
|
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | Nick ODell | Also, minor nitpick: nodes use chain work, not chain height. For small forks where the difficulty is the same, the distinction usually doesn't matter, though. | |
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:56 | comment | added | Nick ODell | If two blockchains are of equal height, clients will prefer the one they received first. | |
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:55 | history | closed | Nick ODell | Duplicate of How is a blockchain split resolved? | |
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:35 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:56 | |||||
Nov 2, 2016 at 20:31 | history | asked | kanu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |