Timeline for Can the Large Bitcoin Collider project 'break' into offline hardware wallets like the Nano Ledger S?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2018 at 23:46 | vote | accept | DCH | ||
| May 3, 2018 at 17:53 | comment | added | Pieter Wuille | I believe they're just having fun spreading nonsense. | |
| May 3, 2018 at 12:10 | comment | added | DCH | Wow .... didn't know that. So why are people at LBC trying ??? Are there that many private keys that are created by broken software ? | |
| S May 3, 2018 at 5:23 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor edits
|
| May 3, 2018 at 5:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 3, 2018 at 5:23 | |||||
| May 3, 2018 at 3:29 | answer | added | Ava Chow♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 2, 2018 at 22:03 | comment | added | Pieter Wuille | Only ones created by broken software. It is computationally infeasible to break an actual randomly generated key. | |
| May 2, 2018 at 21:59 | comment | added | DCH | What do you mean it can't break any private key at all ? I've read they have already 'guessed' several private keys. | |
| May 2, 2018 at 21:01 | comment | added | Pieter Wuille | No, because it can't break any private key at all (if generated correctly). | |
| May 2, 2018 at 19:27 | history | asked | DCH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |