Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
Mar 20, 2012 at 0:04 history edited Chris Moore CC BY-SA 3.0
simplify the wording of the title
Feb 8, 2012 at 10:00 answer added Chris Moore timeline score: 6
S Feb 8, 2012 at 5:45 history suggested Chris Moore CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling, and replaced 'account' with 'address' throughout
Feb 8, 2012 at 5:30 review Suggested edits
S Feb 8, 2012 at 5:45
S Sep 11, 2011 at 17:49 history suggested Artem Kaznatcheev CC BY-SA 3.0
this is related to the Gini coefficient question; since it would require access to similar statistics
Sep 11, 2011 at 7:04 review Suggested edits
S Sep 11, 2011 at 17:49
Sep 10, 2011 at 5:17 history edited ripper234 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Sep 10, 2011 at 5:15 comment added ripper234 @nmat - accounts = wallets?
Sep 10, 2011 at 5:15 comment added ripper234 @David - Even if this is questionable, I'd like to see where it leads.
Sep 10, 2011 at 1:31 comment added nmat What do you mean by accounts? Are you only talking about exchanges?
Sep 9, 2011 at 21:08 answer added DeathAndTaxes timeline score: 0
Sep 9, 2011 at 19:47 comment added David Schwartz Assuming the number of accounts per person is 1 on average is not enough. If there's one guy who holds 10 Bitcoins but has 100 accounts and 100 rich guys who consolidate all their Bitcoins into one Mt. Gox account, that's one account per person on average. But it still renders looking at Bitcoin account holdings to determine spread/concentration meaningless. You need a lot more assumptions and many of those are much more questionable.
Sep 9, 2011 at 14:38 answer added klemen timeline score: 2
Sep 9, 2011 at 13:58 history asked ripper234 CC BY-SA 3.0