Timeline for Are there any "slow" sidechains? What are the tradeoffs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2020 at 16:58 | comment | added | yozaam | Ahhh, My bad, anyways your comment made me think ( with the brain of Google ) and I came across an article by the Vitalik Buterin in 2015, check it out, On Slow and Fast Block Times It is such an interesting discussion, I'm a little new to the blockchain space and everyday I get to learn something that makes me wonder. | |
| Jan 20, 2020 at 4:23 | comment | added | philbw4 | Hi, thanks for your answer. However, I'm not suggesting anything about making blocks bigger. In fact, for a "slow" sidechain, and depending on the use case, I think the blocks of the side chain may even end up extremely small. Naturally this would render such a sidechain useless as a "money" for any on-side-chain transactions, but nevertheless such a side chain could still support some off chain (lightning-like) protocols. There may, of course, be other use-cases too. | |
| Jan 19, 2020 at 6:20 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 19, 2020 at 11:28 | |||||
| Jan 19, 2020 at 6:02 | history | answered | yozaam | CC BY-SA 4.0 |