Timeline for Can a bitcoin be destroyed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 14, 2011 at 14:08 | comment | added | eMansipater | Kinda getting off-topic and deep into a theoretical situation here. | |
| Sep 14, 2011 at 11:38 | comment | added | Stéphane Gimenez | They are also concerned about keeping their protocols and internals as clean as possible. What's the point of an upgrade if you end up with all the flaws and curses of the previous system? | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 18:55 | comment | added | eMansipater | BTC2 are the ones who are so concerned with bridging the two currencies, right? | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 17:17 | comment | added | Stéphane Gimenez | Sorry, I thought that insertion of BTC2 data into BTC1 block chain was the obvious way to go. But according to you, inserting BTC1 data into BTC2 block chain would be better? | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 14:08 | comment | added | eMansipater | You've got it a little too complicated there. All BTC2 has to understand and import is the BTC1 block chain and the private keys from BTC1. When it imports the private keys and also sees that those keys have sent bitcoins to the designated black hole, it credits the private keys in the new system. It's not really that hard to implement. | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 0:17 | history | answered | Stéphane Gimenez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |