Timeline for How do we know which soft-forks were implemented using User-Activated Soft Fork or Miner-Activated Soft Fork?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2020 at 13:28 | vote | accept | Aman Saggu | ||
| Nov 6, 2020 at 5:24 | comment | added | Aman Saggu | I think the SourceForge soft forks may also have been UASF, particularly 1MB Block Size. | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 4:53 | comment | added | Aman Saggu | Thanks Andrew. This was exactly what I was looking for. I was not entirely sure which type of soft-fork to classify BIP30 as, This is where I got stuck. I never really thought about BIP16 deployment as being different in code and practice. I will have to think about this a bit. | |
| Nov 4, 2020 at 18:40 | history | edited | Ava Chow♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 166 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2020 at 16:32 | history | answered | Ava Chow♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |