According to the bitcoin wiki:

The first 50BTC block reward went to address 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa, though this reward can't be spent due to a quirk in the way that the genesis block is expressed in the code (this may have been intentional).

But where is this quirk? How would you change it to allow it to be spent?

  • One has to mind at that point of time 50 BTC was costing like.. literally 0 cents. I doubt he has given any thought to make this intentional or not.
    – EralpB
    Jun 3, 2018 at 8:46
  • Maybe it is because the 50 BTC reward is technically premined since the code was released 6 days later. So technically it would have been unfair if Satoshi could spend those coins. IMO that's another beauty of Bitcoin. Aug 22, 2021 at 13:45

3 Answers 3


When a node starts up it initializes its copy of the block database alongside the genesis block and then begins the synchronization process. For some reason, Satoshi decided not to add the coinbase transaction from the genesis block to the global transaction database. Thus all the nodes in the network would reject the block.

I'm not sure if this was done on purpose or if it was simply an oversight. In any event, it is forever bound to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa.

  • 3
    How would you change it to allow it to be spent? Add this to the hardfork list Apr 20, 2013 at 6:18
  • How do we know of it if it's not in the database?
    – user5477
    Nov 20, 2013 at 12:23
  • 6
    We know it's not in the database because if you do getrawtransaction 4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b via RPC calls it returns an error, even though you can go to a block explorer (like here) and see that this is the genesis block coinbase transaction.
    – morsecoder
    Nov 21, 2014 at 19:22
  • (Even when -txindex=1 is enabled)
    – morsecoder
    Nov 21, 2014 at 19:49

How would you change it to allow it to be spent?

In order to make the coinbase spendable, the following changes have to be made to validation.cpp (v0.16.2). Note: as mentioned this would be considered a hard fork.

Step 1 - Disable skipping the genesis block (which is intended to keep the bug as part of consensus), Line 1818:

// Special case for the genesis block, skipping connection of its transactions
    // (its coinbase is unspendable)
    if (block.GetHash() == chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) {
        if (!fJustCheck)
        // return true; <- comment this line out

Step 2 - Skip assertion of previous block for genesis block, Line 1874:

if (block.GetHash() != chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock) {

Step 3 - Skip writing undo data for genesis block, Line 1989:

if (block.GetHash() != chainparams.GetConsensus().hashGenesisBlock)
    if (!WriteUndoDataForBlock(blockundo, state, pindex, chainparams))
        return false;

At least with current versions of the Bitcoin Core client, the Genesis block is actually hard coded into the client.

The part of the code that builds this block is located here and I have included a JSON dump of the coinbase transaction below for reference.

    "txid" : "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
    "version" : 1,
    "locktime" : 0,
    "vin" : [
            "coinbase" : "04ffff001d0104455468652054696d65732030332f4a616e2f32303039204368616e63656c6c6f72206f6e206272696e6b206f66207365636f6e64206261696c6f757420666f722062616e6b73",
            "sequence" : 4294967295
    "vout" : [
            "value" : 50.00000000,
            "n" : 0,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                "asm" : "04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f OP_CHECKSIG",
                "hex" : "4104678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5fac",
                "reqSigs" : 1,
                "type" : "pubkey",
                "addresses" : [

Reference Gist

  • 1
    This answer could be improved by addressing why the Genesis Block's output cannot be spent.
    – Murch
    Apr 26, 2018 at 16:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.