If all transactions are public knowledge and coins are identifiable and thus traceable. With the power of subpoena can't a government uncover who bought the coin(s) from an exchange. It might be unlikely but this appears to be a big hole in claim that bitcoins are an anonymous currency. Or do I misunderstand the technology?
Modified 10 years, 1 month ago
Viewed 96 times
@Lohoris There's good info there but everyone is focusing on securing a single transaction not the coin history and more broadly exchanging coins to other currencies. Example: If a government sees a coin go to a known "bad" address then to an exchange. They can then subpoena the exchange and the "bad" person is caught.– DavidMay 3, 2013 at 23:56
yes, that is a known fact.– o0'.May 4, 2013 at 8:09
This is true, but likely criminals would find ways of laundering like they do with conventional fiat currencies - something like shared send (blockchain.info/wallet/send-shared) comes to mind.– George PearceMay 4, 2013 at 18:14
@GeorgePearce Great link, I'm frustrated that kind of anonymity isn't built in but glad to know about that– DavidMay 4, 2013 at 23:45
Add a comment |