Suppose a miner decides to solve the nonce for a particular block, where the miner deliberately excluded a particular transaction from this block. The miner "wins", i.e. they found the nonce value that, when added to the string of the modified block they were trying to solve, hashes to a number below the target number. They send the solution to the network.

Does their block, that ignores the transaction, get accepted by the network? If so, what happens to the ignored transaction? If not, why not?


Miners have complete perogative over what transactions to include. They may include random transactions, the highest fee paying transactions, just their own transactions, or no transactions at all.

If a miner doesn't include a particular transaction from their mempool, it stays there. It will be available for later miners to pick it up and include in their blocks later.

To incentivize miners to include your transaction, you can include a fee. Miners in practice will pick the transactions with the highest fee first. First matters, because blocks have limited capacity, and so there may be more transactions on the network than can fit in a block.

  • Thanks for answering. So can a miner get away with double-spending if they double-spend, and then solve a block that contains only one of those spending transactions? May 27 at 17:25
  • 1
    In case there are two conflicting (but otherwise valid) transactions, miners can choose which ones makes it. That's their primary function. May 27 at 18:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.