1

Something strange just occurred on my LND node, making me think I don't understand something about lightning fees.

I have channels to A & B, who only ever asked me to route transactions going to C.

Based on the assumption that the fee is calculated from the fee rates of the outbound channel of a route, I figured I could set the fees of the channels to A & B to 0 (base + feerate) since they are never the outbound channel, so I never earn fees through them, so it incentivizes routes in the other way. Not earning me fees, but rebalancing the channels for free.

Minutes later, I got 4 routes between A to B. But to my surprise, those routes supposedly earnt me fees, according to RTL, corresponding to the feerate before i set it to 0.

How can this happen if I have set 0 fees for both channels? Could it be some kind of update issue, where the rest of the network thinks the channels are now free, but the updated fee is not yet applied? Or something else I don't understand?

2
  • There is a feerate relative to the amount sent and there is a flat base fee. Could you clarify whether you have set both to zero, or just one?
    – Murch
    Jan 2, 2023 at 16:15
  • 2
    Changing the fee on existing channels may take time to propagate. As the payments you mentioned happened soon ('minutes later'), is it possible that the sending A node acted still with the old fee setting? Afterall it's the sender who specifies all the fees for all the routing nodes upfront.
    – OptOut
    Jan 3, 2023 at 8:48

1 Answer 1

1

Most probable explanation for now : the channels who never routed betwen them before happened to route just after the change, but the sender did not know about the fee change yet

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.