This video claims that Litecoin is more secure than Bitcoin.

If the only differentiator between LTC and BTC is SCrypt, then I don't see how a merkle chain of 6 blocks would be more secure than the other.

Can someone explain the details of why he thinks this the case?

  • Could you please provide a quote of the relevant part of the video and/or the time where it occurs in the video (so one could skip to the relevant part)?
    – Murch
    Sep 3, 2013 at 21:33
  • @Murch The video is sparse on meat and full of fluff. I'm trying to find out where their source is. From what I can tell, these are LTC investors promoting a tulip market Sep 3, 2013 at 22:28
  • In Bitcoin you have on average 1 block per 10 minutes. In Litecoin you have on average 1 block per 2.5 minutes. So if the merchant waits the same amount of time for confirmations, he will have in Litecoin more confirmations and hence more security. See also bitcoil.co.il/Doublespend.pdf. Feb 17, 2014 at 17:33
  • @MeniRosenfeld is the security of each the same of BTC and LTC in intervals of 10 minutes? I would think this would be the case... Feb 17, 2014 at 21:31
  • @makerofthings7: Your sentence is difficult to parse, but - all else being equal (only difference is mean block interval), waiting 10 minutes in LTC is more secure than waiting 10 minutes in BTC; at least in any scenario we should be concerned with. More details are in the linked paper. Feb 18, 2014 at 15:21

1 Answer 1


TL;DR: He compares one hour worth of transaction blocks, not six blocks. I.e. he compares the security of 6 blocks in the bitcoin network opposed to 24 blocks in the litecoin network.

In the video the host reads from a sheet with calculations that is supposed to prove that Litecoin is more secure than bitcoin. The calculation is based on the assumption that a 51% attacker wants to mine one hour worth of blocks with 35% of the mining power. Finally, he concludes that 8 transaction blocks in the litecoin network offer a similar security as 6 blocks in the bitcoin network. I.e. block to block litecoin isn't securer than bitcoin, however it reaches the same level of security in less time.

I can't comment in how far the presented numbers are factual (I didn't repeat the calculation), however I am not convinced of the conclusion "litecoin is magnitudes more secure than bitcoin". A 51% attack does not require an hour worth of blocks, but rather a specific number of blocks, in which even the host tells us that Bitcoin is more secure.

  • I agree, the ratio is compute power over time, not blocks. A shorter block interval doesn't mean higher security, it just means more frequent confirms. Sep 3, 2013 at 22:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.