1

This question already has an answer here:

Would it be possible to hamper the network's efforts in validating blocks by creating millions and millions of bogus transactions- simply sending back and forth say 0.1 BTC from address A --> B --> C --> A and so on endlessly? Obviously this would hard to do by hand but if there were an automated script it could be done theoretically quite easily..

Or would this strategy have absolutely no effect?

marked as duplicate by Nate Eldredge, Murch, Stéphane Gimenez, dchapes, Dr.Haribo Dec 31 '13 at 1:07

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • The OP does not speak about dust (small transactions and 0.1 BTC seems big enough). He speaks about cyclic transactions. – Salvador Dali Dec 9 '13 at 0:41
  • well, basically that person would be paying a shitload of transaction fees or would cause transactions without fees to be delayed. Big whoop? – Murch Dec 9 '13 at 3:29
1

You need to provide fees on bitcoin transactions, in which case, you are producing economically valid transactions and will run out of money eventually.

Currently the min fee is 0.0001 (BTC).

Listed here - https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees

  • I can not see where it is written that fee is compulsory. – Salvador Dali Dec 9 '13 at 0:43
0

You can to a certain degree abuse the fact that very large amounts of Bitcoin will be free to make a transaction with. There's at least one address which has been sending the same coins to itself many hundreds of times and abusing this. In most cases this is prevented by the transaction fee, which is one of it's primary purposes.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.