Should I use a different address for every transaction? If yes, why? For safety? What happens I use the same address to get bitcoins from 2 different people, what happens?

1 Answer 1


The only reason why it is recommended to use a different address for every transaction, is for increased anonymity - it makes it more difficult to trace, and next to impossible to prove, that the recipient of transaction A is the same person as the recipient of transaction B.

If you publish an address to receive payments online, and keep it static, everyone can go to http://blockexplorer.com/ and see all the money you have received, and calculate how much money you got. If you change the address after every transaction, it makes it much more difficult - someone who have to constantly monitor your web page with the published address to know all your addresses you received money on. And if you keep the page with the published address non-public, such as that your customer has to log-in to his account on your system to see the address, that makes it practically impossible for third parties to monitor your income, find out how much money you have and what you spend it on.

  • OK, I get it. What happens if my computer will crash? Do I lose all my bitcoins?
    – Klajdi
    Nov 23, 2011 at 17:17
  • 1
    That's a different question, which is answered here: bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/116/…
    – D.H.
    Nov 23, 2011 at 17:24
  • 3
    Another reason is so that you know who paid you. If you give the same address to everyone, it's harder to know who sent you the Bitcoins. Nov 23, 2011 at 18:06
  • 1
    But as far as I can tell, as soon as you create a transaction bundling the money from several addresses and sending them to one other, everyone can tell that these addresses belong together? Or am I wrong there?
    – glglgl
    Nov 24, 2011 at 8:06
  • 1
    Another reason is extra security. Once you make a transaction you reveal your public key. Yes it's public and should be safe, but if a serious weakness is ever discovered in Secp256k1 then funds where the public key is known are at risk first.
    – Jannes
    Jul 17, 2015 at 8:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.