Also, the name Earthcoin suggests to me that it may be somehow more sustainable with regards to the computing resources required to support it; is there any basis in that?

The official site appears to be http://getearthcoin.com/ which has some pretty logos but is woefully lacking in technical detail. As it probably always the case with an altcoin, it also has a thread on bitcointalk.org which seems to describe a very odd block reward system with some days paying 2 or 5 times the normal block reward.


2 Answers 2


As mentioned in the BitcoinTalk thread.

Our goal isn't to compete, as much as compliment, create balance, and not divert into launching 9 more coins because we can.

It doesn't look there is much difference. It may have a different block time, reward, and cap, but that is standard stuff to change for an altcoin. There appears to be absolutely no technological advance. It donates a percentage of coins to charity but that means nothing if it has no value.


Technical differences

  • Supports transaction messaging (short messages in the blockchain that can go with a transaction)
  • Upcoming android app should be the first one to support transaction messaging.
  • Retargets difficulty after every block so it has resistance to block processing when difficulty spikes due to multipool hopping
  • Much faster transaction times. Block target time is 1 minute.
  • fluctuating mining rewards so coin production varies with seasons (gradual and sinusoidal in nature). Some say this is meant to emulate boom and bust cycles by mimicking periods of abundance and scarcity.
  • 2x and 5x Bonus payout days to keep things interesting for miners over the long term.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.