0

If balances are calculated on the fly by offsetting all the transactions flowing in and out of a public address, will this degrade the performance of calculating such balances in years to come, i.e. when large volumes of transaction history have accumulated? How many transactions would result in a noticeable drop in performance? or is the threshold so high that it's not likely ever to be reached by the vast majority?

Improve this question
0
2

The balance is calculated from something called UTXO, this is a list of unspent coins, it is created on blockchain rescans and updated on receiving of new blocks. It is therefore not dependent on transaction history size but only all current available coins fragmentation.

There are performance issues with this solution also, but they are been worked on...

Improve this answer
2
  • I think UTXO stands here for unspent transaction outputs in case somebody else was also wondering. – Murch♦ Feb 16 '14 at 18:22
  • When the transaction makes it to the blockchain, everycoin in it's input is destroyed and new coins are created - on per each output. – Krtek Net Feb 17 '14 at 12:24
1

The calculation of the balance of a public address is not part of transaction validation. In order for a transaction to be considered valid, it must redeem unspent transaction outputs. Transaction outputs are always redeemed entirely, so there is no need to calculate the balance of a public address, only to check that these outputs have not been redeemed (spent) before.

So the scalability of balance calculation is not an issue that affects the processing of payments. That said, each bitcoin node still must remember the list of unspent transaction outputs.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.