2

If I create two transactions:

  1. Send BTC from output X to Y, no fee is attached.
  2. Send BTC from output Y to Z, fee is attached (this depends on the previous tx).

Would nodes propegate these two transactions? Would miners mine them?

In other words, if transaction T2 depends on T1 and I want to broadcast both together - can I save some fees on T1?

1 Answer 1

1

Probably not. Clients can set whatever rule they like for transaction fees, but they normally adhere to the Satoshi client rules described at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees. However, note the section on transaction priority; if you have an address holding some old coins, it's quite likely a transaction out of that address will have high enough priority for you to avoid transaction fees by default.

To implement what you describe, you would need a client that does something like hold all low-fee transactions in a small pool and watches for new transactions out of their output addresses. That's certainly possible to implement, but it seems to me that it would be the sort of service you'd pay a premium for, not receive a discount on.

2
  • FYI another user just told me he tested it and it does work ... I guess testing this is the best way to understand whether it works or not, rather than relying on theory.
    – ripper234
    Mar 13, 2014 at 12:15
  • 1
    Maybe a lucky connection to a pool like Eligius that accepts no-fee transactions? I agree, testing is the way to go. Too many variables. Mar 13, 2014 at 12:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.