0

What is the minimum standard for authenticating a bitcoin user. Would it be enough, for instance to verify that someone named "Tom Au" will answer to that name at this email address? Or are more detailed checks required?

Edit: Authentication would mean that I am what I say I am, that I am a human being and not a robot,and that I can do what I purport to be doing (trading Bitcoin).

Is there a public, or central registry for computer users?

In this event, would something as strong as "hashing" be needed for data storage and retrieval?

Would a web of trust concept work for the bitcoin community?

  • "Authenticate" can mean a lot of things, and I'm unaware of any standards in this direction. In what sense would checks be required? Required by whom? Perhaps you should explain in more detail what you are trying to accomplish. – Nate Eldredge Apr 21 '14 at 18:54
  • This is the same problem that CAPTCHAs want to solve and there is not a good solution to this problem. – John L. Jegutanis Apr 21 '14 at 22:08
1

There are different KYC (Know Your Customer) laws in different jurisdictions, but generally it takes information that is difficult or very time consuming to falsify. License/ID scans, utility bills, and SSNs are examples

Suggesting "hashing" as a KYC solution suggests you do not know what hashing is (unless you were referring to the way a server should store such confidential information). I suggest you use the search function or explore bitcoin wikipedia to learn more.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.