4

Meni mentioned Proof of Stake as a possible way to augment Proof of Work as the underlying mechanism powering Bitcoin confirmations.

Is it viable? What are its downsides? Who has analyzed it? (I don't see a lot of people on this thread)

closed as not constructive by David Schwartz Mar 11 '12 at 13:18

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

-2

This answer might be enough to make proof-of-stake not needed.

  • 2
    Your question is a good question, but this is not an answer to this question. Again, please do not move random discussions which are not backed up with some solid theory to this site (Especially using two levels of redirection). – Stéphane Gimenez Mar 11 '12 at 12:27
  • I did mean it as an answer. If proof of stake is not needed (as I currently believe might be the case), then the whole viability question is moot. – ripper234 Mar 11 '12 at 13:14

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.