Litecoin has faster blocks, but needs more confirms.
I understand this is because of possible reorgs, but how come it also needs 10 minutes for confirms even though the blocks are faster?
Bitcoin Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Bitcoin crypto-currency enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityLitecoin has faster blocks, but needs more confirms.
I understand this is because of possible reorgs, but how come it also needs 10 minutes for confirms even though the blocks are faster?
If a block is found super fast, like 1 minute, then you have your first confirmation in 1 minute. The 10 minutes is average of time between block confirmation. In fact, since the network in increasing in speed, we are more or less confirming block at 9 minutes each.
In some case, we are out of luck and a single block can take 30 minutes.
That said, the number of confirmation required to accept a payment is totally as the discretion of the merchant. You can accept with 0 confirmation, 1 or 2. Some go more than that but that should be for very big amount (like 100,000$ +).
Another alt coin can confirmed in 10 sec, that's irrelevant because 10 confirmations in that blockchain is still less secure than a single confirmation from the bitcoin network because finding a block in the bitcoin network is harder than finding 10 block in an alt-coin.
There is a lot of confusion about this topic. As I explain in Analysis of Hashrate-Based Double Spending, the number of needed confirmations stays more or less the same when you reduce the time between blocks.
How many confirmations to wait for is a matter of taste and often arbitrary. It's possible that because of the lower total computational power dedicated to the Litecoin network, it is assumed an attacker could have a higher percentage of the hashrate, and so more confirmations are recommended. But you should still be safe with 2-3 confirmations, which take 5-7.5 minutes on average.