I understand that adding a small transaction fee as incentive ensures block generators will include your transaction.

  1. When you have no transaction fee, what is their motivation then?
  2. Why do some people include it and some don't?
  3. I have read many accounts stating that small transactions are less likely to be included - so is a big (in terms of amount of bitcoin) transaction with no fees more likely to be included, and if so, why?
  • Bitcoin fees are based on the amount of data, not the amount of the transaction. For #3 Do you mean "larger amount" rather than "big" (which is ambiguous as to which property it is referring?) May 30, 2012 at 15:55
  • 4
    Miners have a vested interest in the Bitcoin system as a whole being useful and functioning smoothly as this increases the value of their Bitcoins. May 30, 2012 at 19:05
  • I transacted one Satoschi (0.000 000 01 BTC) without a fee, and it's been idling for a week now. I wish transactions had a fixed percentage for fees so the whole thing would not be so arbitrary.
    – Heimdal
    Mar 20, 2013 at 13:01

2 Answers 2


1) There is no motivation, asides your goodwill, or possibly wanting to support some useful Bitcoin tools, like the Bitcoin Faucet (transaction fees could eat up a lot of coins there).

2) It's a matter of how their pools and clients are set up. Some want to support the community by allowing no-fee transactions to be included in a block (as it costs them nothing), while others want to encourage people to pay fees by only including transactions with fees.

3) Technically, it might be less likely to be included if it gets really big in terms of data size (upwards to filling a block), but in most cases it won't matter (at least for now). Amount of Bitcoins sent doesn't really matter at the moment, but transactions on really small amount of coins can be discriminated against in the future should spamming them become more prevelent.

All in all, it is encouraged that you pay your dues when sending transactions, as it helps the Bitcoin project grow. If nobody was paying to get their transactions processed, the miners might soon not earn enough to get by (especially with reward halving slowly getting closer), which would result in them stopping their operations and weakening the Bitcoin network. It's not much of a threat yet, but in the future it can become important.

  • Did the order for your answers for #1 and #2 get inverted? And in the question for #3, "big" probably means "large amount", not "lots of data". May 30, 2012 at 15:54
  • @StephenGornick No, the answers are okay, why? And I edited the #3 to cover both cases.
    – ThePiachu
    May 30, 2012 at 17:26

A miner does have an incentive to include these transactions, because it will make the bitcoin system stronger/more robust. People will trust that their transaction will go through. As such, his own mined bitcoins will be more valuable.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.