This question already has an answer here:

I'm not interesting in mining myself, just interested in the topic. I understand that you can still get bitcoin by contributing computation power to a pool (a company)

  1. Does only one person/company receive the bitcoin reward every 10 minutes? So in 1 hour, only 6 individual/company gets the reward? It's a zero-sum game?

  2. If #1 is true, doesn't that mean only the fastest/best machines has any chance of getting the reward?

  3. If #1 and #2 are true, does that mean that mining without joining a pool is a futile effort for any average individual with average income because he cannot compete with pools and companies have more powerful computers?

  4. if #1,2,3 are true, does that mean that the companies that sell mining computers/devices are marketed towards those who join pools rather than mine the network themselves?

marked as duplicate by Murch Aug 10 '15 at 15:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

It's more like a lottery than like a race. Let's say one miner has 90% of the hashrate and another has 10%. It is not true that every 10 minutes the big miner will always win because he's faster. Rather, the big miner has 90% chance of winning and the small miner has 10% - in exact proportion to their hashrate (unless they carry out some sophisticated attacks).

As such, to compete you don't need a more powerful computer, but a more efficient one. If the computer is efficient enough, then you'll be profitable and what you'll get is exactly proportional to its power.

  • 1
    Hey Meni, Thanks for your continued effort here. It pains me point out, that this question and therefore also your answer will probably not survive, as the question doesn't work well with our format. I suggest that you re-post your answer to Why doesn't the same miner always win?, where it would also fit well. Please consider not answering low-quality posts, as your effort might just be wasted. – Murch Aug 10 '15 at 14:20
  • @Murch: I understand what you're saying, but while it might not be the SE way, I feel uncomfortable leaving questions unanswered. I adjust the amount of effort put into the answer - for a low-quality question I spend only a minute or so, in full knowledge it might go to waste. Specifically, I don't think much of this answer can be reused, as I didn't actually talk about why the fastest miner doesn't always win. – Meni Rosenfeld Aug 10 '15 at 18:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.