1

The proof-of-work solution is simple but has many drawbacks (waste of time, energy and uncertainties about its security in the future).

The consensus solutions proposed by Ripple/Stellar are too complex, and with complexity also comes uncertainty/risk. (See Stellar catastrophic failure!)

What do you think are the chances of someone coming with a simpler solution, out of the box, something much more straightforward that no-one has thought about it?

3
  • 1
    Ripple is effectively completely centralized.
    – Claris
    Commented Sep 4, 2015 at 8:21
  • @Bitcoin That doesn't really act as an example of why it can't be done, because avoiding centralization was never one of the goals of Ripple.
    – Nick ODell
    Commented Sep 4, 2015 at 8:57
  • 1
    @NickODell Mostly pointing out that Ripple/Stellar being complex isn't an argument against it being a replacement decentralized consensus.
    – Claris
    Commented Sep 4, 2015 at 9:00

1 Answer 1

3

The double-spending problem had been unsolved in decentralized protocols for decades. It seems unlikely that a second (different) solution would suddenly materialize.

It never was a problem in centralized setups, where the central entity would provide a referee function.

4
  • Didn't ripple do it? Not going into the merit of if it is better or worse, but it is an alternative solution, correct?
    – Peter Mel
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 19:03
  • Quoting Bitcoin (the stackexchange user) : "Ripple is effectively completely centralized. – Bitcoin Sep 4 at 8:21". Your question doesn't make sense of you allow for centralized solutions, so I'm assuming you're asking about a decentralized solution.
    – Jannes
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 19:57
  • @Jannes You are correct. For a centralized solution the double-spending problem does not make any sense. So what is all the hype around ripple? Did they solve the double-spending solution or not?
    – Peter Mel
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 22:07
  • They're just trying to hijack the bitcoin success to promote their own stuff. Up to the point of claiming with a straight face that it is decentralized. You see that a lot in bitcoin space, or any space where money is involved. Always beware of the vultures.
    – Jannes
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 23:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.