...or is there any way for a SegWit witness to contain a "legacy" signature?

  • Do you mean 'Can a tx spend both segwit and non-segwit outputs?' or 'Can a segwit output be spent using a legacy signature?'
    – Nick ODell
    Mar 3, 2017 at 20:10
  • The latter. In theory. Like, if I ripped the signature from a segwit transaction and reformed it to non-segwit, would it be valid? Or vice-versa. If I took a valid pre-segwit signature and reformatted to segwit, would it be valid? Or would it require re-signing following the BIP143 rules?
    – pinhead
    Mar 3, 2017 at 20:12

2 Answers 2


I don't think that's possible, even if you intentionally construct the transaction to be used as both segwit or non-segwit, and if you assume that there are segwit and non-segwit outputs for the same address.

The first ~36 bytes of a hashed transaction look like this:


count   field name
4       version
1-3     varint of number of txins
32      sha256d of previous transaction


count   field name
4       version
32      sha256d of concatenated prevout fields

You would need to find two pieces of data such that hash(x)[1:16] = hash(y)[0:15] or hash(x)[3:16] = hash(y)[0:13], which I think is about as difficult as a collision attack (to a factor of 2^24 :P).

You can try to get around this by setting SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY on the segwit side, but that puts a zero where the number of inputs should go on the non-segwit transaction, and that's definitely not valid in any signature mode. I think even if you sign in SIGHASH_NONE, you can't convert a segwit transaction to a non-segwit transaction, or vice versa.


No, it cannot. There are several reasons this won't work. For example, the signatures in Bitcoin transactions commit to the complete transaction by means of signing the sighash. However the sighash is formed by a different scheme in SegWit than for legacy transactions. Another is that SegWit transactions contain elements that are not present in regular transactions, namely marker, flag and witness. Thus even if sighashes were using the same scheme, the content that they commit to could never match up.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.