Was wondering what signs people look out for to indicate whether independent mining or pooled mining can become less feasible? and also, How can users detect problematic levels of miner pooling?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Gopoi, Murch Apr 4 '17 at 14:27

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Doesn't that depend on what problem you're trying to address? – Nick ODell Mar 15 '17 at 16:22

The level of pooled mining is never problematic.

If all miners are mining in pools there is no issue, as long as they are not mining in the same pool. What actually is a problem is if the majority of hashpower is controlled by a single entity. This is widely discussed on this site; search for "51% attack".

Feasibility of solo mining is not affected by the level of pooled mining. Most people consider solo mining infeasible due to the fact that they have a very small share of the global hashpower, which means they have extremely high variance, turning mining into a lottery for them. But whether most hashpower in the world is in pools does not affect you as a solo miner.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.