2

Such as this transaction: 92088fe6b9d9c9db84d26481b80104f8ca566649a656b7aa3e67432b346cbf1c, which has over 5000 receiving addresses.

It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business partners at once, let along each individual output is quite small. If that is done for privacy protection purpose, over 5000 receiving addresses is too excessive.

1 Answer 1

3

It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business partners at once

Why? It's a mass payment for "shareholders". In this instance, the transaction you mentioned is a known payment from a pool to their miners.

8
  • With many of the payments under than one dollar?
    – Aqqqq
    Apr 7, 2017 at 8:37
  • Why not? The transaction you mentioned is known as a payment to miners from a pool bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1338693.msg13656238#msg13656238
    – amaclin
    Apr 7, 2017 at 8:43
  • Thank you. Are you aware of any way to find out which transaction is a payment to miners from a pool?
    – Aqqqq
    Apr 7, 2017 at 8:46
  • I've edited your post to add the comment's content to the answer, as the comment addressed the question more directly than the actual answer.
    – Murch
    Apr 7, 2017 at 9:15
  • When I asked for specifically the transaction I mentioned, the field enough_fee is false. Is the fact that it is a mass payment from pool which allows the transaction to be confirmed despite the fact that there is no enough fees?
    – Aqqqq
    Apr 7, 2017 at 10:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.