A rather dumb title, however I have question that I cant get a grip on related to bitcoin:

  • If the amount of bitcoin is supposed to have an upper limit, what is the incentive to mine in the future if that limit is reached?
  • If one entity controls more than 50% of the network then the protocol will break down, doesn't the continuous rise in difficulty destine that only one ASIC miner will be left?
  • Who is it that sets that difficulty level and why then is it called decentral?
  • To participate you need the complete blockchain stored locally. How is this supposed to scale when data to store is growing exponentially?

I seems that the system is built to only day just vanish.

closed as too broad by Pieter Wuille, Highly Irregular, remedcu, Andrew Chow Nov 17 '17 at 18:44

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    please try not to put too many questions into one. All of your questions have already been discussed/answered her in the forum. One 1.) the fees. On 2.) who can predict the future correctly? But yes, with miner centralization there is a certain risk. On 3.) the protocol has an algorythm to adjust difficulty. It's not a person. On 4.) No, you don't need the complete blockchain, you can work with SPV wallets, and start immedeatly. – pebwindkraft Nov 16 '17 at 11:20
  • It is preferred if you can post separate questions instead of combining your questions into one. That way, it helps the people answering your question and also others hunting for at least one of your questions. Thanks! – Andrew Chow Nov 17 '17 at 18:44

I'll address your points individually:

  • Bitcoin mining in the future will be supported by transaction fees rather than the block reward, see this question for more details: What will happen to mining after the 20 999 999th Bitcoin?
  • Not sure what you mean here, why would an increasing difficulty lead to only one miner? If people stopped mining, the difficulty would go back down again because the hash rate would have decreased, so there's an equilibrium point based on how profitable mining is at any one time
  • The difficulty is just an algorithm which is based on the time taken to mine the last 2016 blocks (technically only 2015, because of a bug, but that doesn't matter). So everyone agrees on the difficulty, everyone can calculate the current difficulty by looking at the blockchain. No one person sets the difficulty, everyone does.
  • Scaling is an issue which is a big topic at the moment, because yeah the blockchain is getting very large. But please note that it's possible to run a pruned node which only stores some of the most recent blocks and doesn't all the way back to the genesis block. Full nodes never use this historical data anyway other than when serving brand new nodes with blocks to get them up and running, and when rebuilding their UTXO set, which normally is only done once when the node first starts and doesn't need to be done again.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.