This is how we can find the WIF from a private key:
private_key = '000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f' decoded_private_key = bitcoin.decode_privkey(private_key, 'hex') wif = bitcoin.encode_privkey(decoded_private_key, 'wif') # 5HpHgWkLaovGWySEFpng1XQ6pdG1TzNWR7SrETvfTRVdKHNXZh8
But how to get the WIF compressed?
Should I do:
private_key = '000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f' compressed_private_key = private_key + '01' wifcomp1 = bitcoin.encode_privkey(bitcoin.decode_privkey(private_key, 'hex'), \ 'wif_compressed') # KwDidQJHSE67VJ6MWRvbBKAxhD3F48DvqRT6JRqrjd7MHLBjGF7V
wifcomp2 = bitcoin.encode_privkey(bitcoin.decode_privkey(compressed_private_key, 'hex'), \ 'wif_compressed') # KwFfpDsaF7yxCELuyrH9gP5XL7TAt5b9HPWC1xCQbmrxfFzfMakg
It seems that #1 is correct and not #2.
Also it seems that:
the non-compressed WIF, imported in Electrum, produces finally a non-compressed Base58 address,
the compressed WIF, imported in Electrum, produces finally a compressed Base58 address
which seems obvious. But I'd like to be sure that compression of WIF and compression of addresses at the end is really linked.
Can we conclude that the use of a compressed or non-compressed WIF (both encoding the same private key) will determine, when importing them in Electrum, if the public-key (and thus the address eventually) will finally be compressed or non-compressed?