Consider the bitcointalk donation address 17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9.

This has many incoming transactions with large number of dust inputs (hundreds) that sum to nice rounded numbers as in the following examples:

ba930f48aae32b8915a6e413ed297060291fec7fc916cf57b0751e0f77c41df2 (inputs sum to 0.05)

c0f25cc0f008ac935b3a38fecdea42e062ba3e3e7395161a2ad1b38754ee31c0 (inputs sum to 0.05)

1f4e0b21e6edd0dc1148116200426f390880e3e33ae0723de8415836874f7a3e (inputs sum to 0.5)

These can't be coincidences. What wallet is being used here? Does it solve the "subset sum" problem for each transaction to ensure that the sums are round numbers? I know the problem won't be hard for such small sizes but still needs solving.

Another explanation might be that one of the input transactions is intentionally created to cause the sum to be a round number.

  • I believe that's the question. Selecting a large number of inputs to perfectly sum a round figure is non-trivial. – Raghav Sood May 30 at 0:26
  • Why would someone do that? And out of curiosity who is the sender? – Jus12 May 30 at 11:27

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.