Say someone has generated n bitcoins. Now, these are from very good entropy. When regenerating new keys, would it be a good idea to take the keys for entropy improvement? On the one hand, the entropy is already destinated on the other hand, it comes from the best sources? As special case, would talking only parts of it be a better idea?

closed as unclear what you're asking by RedGrittyBrick, Pieter Wuille, Raghav Sood, chytrik, Anonymous Nov 28 '18 at 16:59

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Welcome to Bitcoin.stackexchange. I am having trouble understanding your question. When you write "n bitcoins" and "new keys" do you mean "bitcoin keys" in both cases? What do you mean by "destinated"? Why do you write that the entropy comes from the best sources? – RedGrittyBrick Nov 14 '18 at 15:22

In basic terms, entropy is good when it is secret and not good when it is known to the attacker or guessable.

Adding the keys would not improve your already existing entropy (although they wouldn't worsen it either). They are just derived from that entropy, so an attacker who breaks your "very good entropy" can just compute those keys. He can also just compute the required parts.

If you have "very good entropy", just use that for how ever many keys you want. Any decent PRNG should have a sufficiently long period until it starts repeating.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.