According to this article: (https://medium.com/@avivzohar/the-spectre-protocol-7dbbebb707b5) written by one of Spectre's author (Aviv Zohar), it is mentioned that Spectre has weak liveness.

What is the reason of mentioning "weak" for liveness ?

And according to this, can we define a "strong liveness" ?

  • 1
    How exactly does this relate to Bitcoin? – KappaDev Nov 25 '18 at 18:15
  • 2
    @KappaDev I think research about better consensus algorithms is very relevant, even if not applicable in the short term. And even if not, this is just a question about the definition of terminology in consensus systems in general. – Pieter Wuille Nov 25 '18 at 19:10
  • 1
    @KappaDev: According to community consensus, questions about related systems are on-topic, see e.g. bitcoin.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/15/…. – Murch Nov 25 '18 at 20:33
  • @Murch Cool, good to know – KappaDev Nov 25 '18 at 20:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.