I'm trying to understand what can happen if

  • A block consists entirely of 3rd party (xCoin) data like Namecoin
  • There are no Tx fees to collect since they are on alternate chains.
  • Assume that the Block reward is quite low (0.25 BTC).

How will mining be profitable?

If the 3rd party data must subsidize mining, what would that subsidy look like within a block?

  • Exchange rate would be 1000 USD per BTC, so 250 USD per block is not bad.. :)
    – vi.su.
    Mar 6 '13 at 16:04
  • 3
    @vi.su [citation needed]
    – Nick ODell
    Mar 6 '13 at 16:24
  • @makerofthings "A block consists entirely of 3rd party (xCoin) data like Namecoin" NameCoin merged mining adds 32 bytes - which is about 1/5 of one transaction.
    – Nick ODell
    Mar 6 '13 at 16:29
  • @NickODell Just as Namecoin was invented as an alt chain, what I create one, and then some state does as well. Add a few others and the quantity of bytes increases.... Mar 6 '13 at 16:45
  • If a transaction (e.g., xCoin, your example) isn't "paying the freight" it will be cast aside (e.g., take longer to confirm.) If system-wide fees are lower, mining capacity drops to match. That's not a problem unless 51% is a real concern, and that's not a real concern now. Mar 6 '13 at 18:07

Whoever discovers the block can choose what information to put into it. Therefore a miner that finds a hash that has a sufficient level of difficulty can choose to only include transactions that actually pay their transaction fee.

  • Could they also include arbitrary data as well? Mar 6 '13 at 18:06
  • I am not quite sure, the bitcoin wiki doesn't seem to know. You seemed to have believed that you can, what lead you to believe that? Mar 6 '13 at 21:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.