0

article: https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/26/tech/irs-cryptocurrency-taxes/index.html

My background: Good understanding of RSA cryptography, some elliptic curve, Number Theory and I am a (real)programmer

Lets cut to the chase: How is the IRS doing this? Word on the street is ML, which sounds similar to IBM Watson's fraud detection capabilities. How come the IRS has been able to unmask people, while the NSA is helpless against RSA?

We all know from a fact that RSA is unbroken from data exposed by Snowden. They are forced to use workarounds.

Don't make me post in math.stackexchange....

5

Bitcoin doesn't use RSA and there is no encryption or cryptography that hides transaction details. Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. There are unique identifers for every participant in Bitcoin, the somewhat hard part is tying those identifiers to actual people. So there is no RSA, number theory, or ECC involved in what the IRS is doing because none of that is involved in the details they are concerned about.

What observers like the IRS can do is follow transactions and see how money changes hands from some identifers to others. Some identifiers may be known, such as exchanges and other large services. Most are not and likely to be individuals. Using various software tools, you can try to work out how money is changing hands, but it is error prone, can have a lot of false positives, and is actively being counteracted with things like CoinJoins.

But the IRS probably isn't following those transactions. They are doing something much easier: subpoena the exchanges for customer information. By law, exchanges need to gather identifying information about their customers. This includes things like Social Security Number, passport numbers, driver's license numbers, etc. They have to store all of these personally identifying information and they are all tied to user accounts. Additionally, all of these user accounts have trade and transaction history tied to them as well.

So the IRS is basically just asking (or compelling) exchanges to hand over all of this information about their users and comparing the numbers that were filed in their tax returns to the numbers that they calculate based upon the trade and transaction data that they have gotten from the exchanges. No cryptography, machine learning, or even programming involved whatsoever.

  • IANAL, but I believe exchanges are report their users' investment income under certain conditions, so not subpoena is required. – Pieter Wuille Jul 26 at 22:58
  • It was my understanding that ECC was used in Bitcoin, and that the clever programmers avoided using the NIST curves because they have backdoors(crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/…). Its funny how pathetic the government is, always taking the easy way out by sending subpoemas. The NSA at least hires mathematicians. – Pinhead Jul 26 at 23:09
  • ECC is used for authentication (preventing theft), not privacy. It's also not known why Bitcoin's creator used a SEC curve rather than a NIST curve. – Pieter Wuille Jul 26 at 23:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.