Has the Lightning Network reached a level of security and maturity where I can open wumbo channels (channels over the previous 0.1677 BTC limit) and be reasonably confident that I won't lose funds or have my funds locked up for long periods?

  • I think this is an interesting post, beyond just wumbo channels. Opening a larger value channel makes the security/reliability consideration more pertinent, but it is still a consideration in any case. Which is to say, I think editing the question to be generalized to all lightning channels might be worthwhile, but I'll leave that to OP's consideration. – chytrik Sep 24 '20 at 19:56

Lightning is great but one can't say it is battle-tested. If script kids would be interested, they could take down those shiny new 5 BTC wumbo channels with negligible cost and no effort at all.

The underlying issue is that a channel cannot hold more than 483 HTLCs at a time, regardless of the channel capacity. Sending 483 micro-payments to yourself and holding on to the HTLCs is enough to incapacitate a channel for up to two weeks.

By utilizing the max route length to add loops, each payment can consume up to 9 HTLC slots on the target channel. If the script kid is lucky, they only need to send 54 payments to get it done. A single tiny channel takes double-digit amounts of Bitcoin out of business.

Below is me locking up approximately 5,800,000 satoshis with a refundable 18 satoshi payment looping five times through three mainnet channels owned by Bitfinex and OpenNode. For basically as long as I want. This happened today.

Joost locking up sats

Wanting to become the world's payment system sounds good but we can't have trivially exploitable vulnerabilities like this. Walk the talk.

Therefore I started a new project called Circuit Breaker: a firewall for Lightning nodes. The primary goal is to encourage thinking about this problem with the potential to grow into a full-fledged Lightning protection system.

joost debug output

This question was answered by Joost Jager on Twitter.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.