The coinbase mentioned in BIP34 is not the company; it is referring to the first transaction in a Bitcoin block (which is special as it is allowed to bring new currency into circulation).
Coinbase-the-company didn't even exist when BIP34 was written (or at least, wasn't known/public). The company was named after this special transaction.
A coinbase transaction follows the same format as a normal transaction, except:
It has exactly one txin
This txin's prevout hash is 0000...0000.
This txin's prevout index is 0xFFFFFFFF
The txin's prevout script is an arbitrary byte array (it doesn't have to be a valid script, though this is commonly done anyway) of 2 to 100 bytes. It has to start with a ...
Pay-to-PubKey (P2PK) and pay-to-PubKey-Hash (P2PKH) were both introduced in the original Bitcoin 0.1 release. P2PK was used by default for mining and payments received using the interactive IP-to-IP payment protocol; P2PKH was intended for use in non-interactive payments---but P2PKH transactions take up more space in the blockchain than P2PK.
Is this space ...
According to BIP 34 the coinbase transaction is required to start with the block height. The format is a single byte giving the count of bytes to follow (currently 3) and then the block height in little-endian. See Why block height is required in coinbase? for more on the rationale.
478529 decimal is 0x074d41 in hex, so this block's coinbase must begin ...
Here is a breakdown of the entire genesis block:
01000000 - version
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 - prev block
3BA3EDFD7A7B12B27AC72C3E67768F617FC81BC3888A51323A9FB8AA4B1E5E4A - merkle root
29AB5F49 - timestamp
FFFF001D - bits
1DAC2B7C - nonce
01 - number of transactions
01000000 - version
01 - input
how is the output of a coinbase transaction (plus block's transaction fees) different than the outputs of any other transaction?
Because it's validity is tied to WHICH block it is included in. You can't take a coinbase transaction and include it as if it were a standard transaction in another block, because it creates more bitcoins than it spends, which is ...
A coinbase transaction can have as many outputs as the miner who created it wants. You may see that there are not just one output for the reward, sometimes there are multiple outputs so that the coinbase transaction pays to multiple miners. Additionally, there may be other 0 value OP_RETURN outputs if the miner so chooses. Typically this is because the miner ...
David has already given a good explanation of the term coinbase, but I'd like to give further details on the coinbase transaction.
The coinbase transaction is a special type of transaction.
Every block must have a coinbase transaction, other transactions are optional.
The coinbase transaction must be the first transaction of the block (it follows that ...
First of all, when 1 second has passed, the miner can just increment the timestamp in the header. This already gives us 4 Ghash/s rather than 4 GHash/block.
When this is not enough, and the nonce range is exhausted before a second has passed, the miner builds a new proposed block with a hash to search through. Specifically, the very first transaction in the ...
This is a known bug in the early days of bitcoin.
Was fixed by BIP-30 https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0030.mediawiki
There is a discussion here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216938
And yes, 50+50 bitcoins are missed forever.
In fact, there are much more missed bitcoins. For example, 2500 bitcoins were gone to nowhere
in block ...
Look at block #280963. Look at coinbase transaction d1c6b8...fd08. You can see CoinBase data:
This is a script. Look at wiki for details. In coinbase transaction this script can contain any ...
In a limit order, you specify how much of the asset (in this case BTC) you want to buy or sell, and the price you want. If there are matching orders on the book (e.g. someone who wants to sell at the same price, or lower, as the price at which you want to buy), your order will be filled immediately. If not, your order will stay on the book until matching ...
There is a maximum limit on the block reward which is 12.5 BTC but nothing prevents a miner from claiming less than 12.5 BTC. In fact, there have been times when miners forgot to claim any bitcoin at all (claimed 0 BTC), a very expensive mistake. This is probably a mistake from the miner, he could have certainly claimed more bitcoin.
As long as the block ...
Coinbase transactions have some special rules not shared by other transactions:
only one per block
must be the first transaction in the block
must have OP_RETURN output with witness commitment if block includes segwit transactions
must have only one input
the input must have the "coinbase" field instead of a scriptSig
The "coinbase" field is where miners ...
The block that Alice mined includes the mining rewards going to Alice's address. If Eve alters the block data to output the rewards to her own receiving address, then the nonce (and other variable values, I think "extranonce" and timestamp) that Alice used to solve the block will almost certainly no longer solve the block.
Yes, it must.
Block without coinbase transaction will be rejected by network.
From the Protocol, rule #6:
First transaction must be coinbase (i.e. only 1 input, with hash=0, n=-1), the rest must not be
In the same special "generation transaction" that collects the 25 newly minted bitcoins, the miner also collects the total of all the transaction fees in the block, and together can send them to an address(es) of his choosing.
No signature is required; it's a hardcoded perk to whoever manages to find a block.
This is normal. You can see on https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ that BTC 0.001 is a pretty average fee right now.
You should not think of it as a percentage, since the fee for a transaction is not related to the amount of coins transacted. Instead, it has to do with the size of the transaction in bytes, which is more a matter of its complexity (e.g. number ...
Every segwit block has one such OP_RETURN in the coinbase transaction: It's the Merkle root of the witness tree.
When the segwit softfork was activated, this included a fix to the third-party transaction malleability issue that was present on the network before. The issue was that the signature of a transaction could be changed by any other person by ...
There is no technical constraint causing the genesis block's reward to be unspendable forever.
It is a bug that has now become the accepted standard. In the future the genesis block reward could be spent but clients must be updated to fix this bug or they will reject blocks containing a valid input referring to this transaction (...
Every block must include one or more transactions. The first one of these transactions must be a coinbase transaction which should collect and spend the block reward and any transaction fees paid by transactions included in this block.
Bitcoin Foundation Developer Guide— https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide#transaction-data
The extra 0.25058085 BTC is the sum of the transaction fees on the block (each transactions fee is the difference between the value of the transaction's inputs and the transaction's outputs).
As you can see, this block which had no transactions on it, and therefore no transaction fees, had a coinbase transaction whose sum of outputs was exactly equal to ...
Nope. Not 1 bit. A balance (in this context) is the sum of all UTXO's for a given address. There is no limit on the number of UTXO's or their total amount (from the perspective of how the blockchain works and the blockchains limitations).
Software interpreting the balance may have limitations on consuming, processing and/or displaying a number beyond a ...
This is not true. Code and code comments in v0.1.5 (the oldest tagged version in git) enforce that there always is a coinbase transaction and that it must always be the first. There cannot be a coinbase transaction elsewhere in the block. Coinbase transactions are defined as transactions with one input whose previous transaction hash is all 0's and whose ...
I think this is best answered by an example. Let's find the coinbase from a block on the Bitcoin testnet.
First we'll get the hash for a block we want to look at. We'll have a look at the (as I write this) latest block:
> bitcoind getblockcount
> bitcoind getblockhash 81626
The correct answer is: ask Satoshi.
My guessed answers to the questions you asked:
Why only one input? You can't predict when a particular coinbase transaction will make it into a successful block and you can't spend the output of a coinbase transaction for 100 blocks. That means using a regular transaction is much superior for any normal spending. If ...
One of the network rules is that a coinbase's outputs cannot be larger than the current block reward plus the transaction fees of the transactions in the block.
So, a miner claims the transaction fees by increasing the amount of the block reward. This is true even after 2140, when there will be no block reward. (Network rules require that the first ...
In Bitcoin v0.1.5 to v0.3.24, the coinbase scriptSig contained:
txNew.vin.scriptSig << nBits << ++bnExtraNonce;
In Bitcoin v0.4.0 to v0.5.3, it changed to:
pblock->vtx.vin.scriptSig = CScript() << pblock->nTime << CBigNum(nExtraNonce);
Bitcoin v0.6.0 to v0.6.3:
pblock->vtx.vin.scriptSig = (CScript() <&...
No inputs means that the coins are coming from a coinbase transaction, that is, they were only moved "once", when they were created.
Transactions will have different numbers of confirmations based on how recently the funds were moved.