New answers tagged

1

Though not the answer, I’d like to put some light on whether nodes should or should not be rewarded for validation: using a light node wallet puts the wallet itself at (limited) risk rather than the whole network. For example even if all full nodes are malicious, users can resort to running their own full-nodes (there are less likely fork scenarios though). ...


0

TL;DR I believe it is possible if bitcoin were to change to a different consensus mechanism. (A hard fork.) Currently in the bitcoin network only miners get paid, and nodes are operated by volunteers (in the sense that they don't get the rewards miners do). For a truly decentralized system all block rewards should be aligned in such a way, that nodes of all ...


1

To manage your own wallet independently without trusting anyone else, you can download and run Bitcoin Core. This is a full node software that will download and validate the entire blockchain and allow you to create encrypted wallets on your own computer. To get started with Bitcoin Core, you can either download it from bitcoincore.org or compile it directly ...


2

I think you've got your reasoning backwards. The reason we want more people to run nodes is because people only run nodes if they get value out of it, so more people running nodes means more people getting value. If you incentivized people to run nodes, then they would be running nodes even if they produced no value at all. Of what possible benefit would ...


1

There are few minor reasons why this might to useful for an electrum server: Knowing what block height / protocol version other peers are operating via features advertised by peers to verify network issues Banning bad peers via blacklisted peer list


19

I don't think it is possible. There are a few problems to incentivizing the operation of nodes. When you pay people to run nodes, people running multiple nodes provide less value but earn more for the same effort. In the worst case, you may be paying botnets to run nodes on other people's hardware. It's hard to prove that you're actually validating, because ...


2

Can bitcoin protocol be changed to add economic incentives to validating nodes? I think that would have to be a hard fork, a different currency. Maybe the validating nodes can somehow prove that they have verified the blocks Validation is not a service. No full nodes care whether other nodes do any validating. It isn't something anyone should pay for ...


1

However, as we know that things are driven more by market economics rather than philanthropic or feel good factors. Running a bitcoin node is more than just helping the network. One recent tweet summarizes it in the best way possible, running a node is nothing but downloading the bitcoin implementation software, install and run like lot of other software: ...


0

Bitcoin nodes cannot relay anything except Bitcoin protocol related P2P messages. You can read the packet capture logs in wireshark while using two regtest nodes with the below steps: Install Wireshark: https://www.wireshark.org/download.html Create two directories for regtest nodes, node1 and node2 with below bitcoin.conf: regtest.rpcport=18222 rpcuser=...


1

If you're positive your /var/lib/tor/onion_auth/zerotobtc.auth_private file on your client is correct (a single line, containing: {replace-with-your-onion-url-without-the-extension}:descriptor:x25519:{replace-with-your-base32-encoded-private-key}) then the most likely reason it isn't working is your file permissions aren't allowing Tor to read the file. Try ...


2

For hierarchical deterministic wallets this is usually solved with a "gap limit". It means that when restoring from a recovery seed (or similar backup) the wallet will start checking for addresses until it finds a long enough run (e.g. 100) of unused addresses, and then it assumes that's all there is. Conversely, the wallet should not allow you to ...


0

Yes, you can have a lot of data from a full node. Transaction history, fees paid, hashrate (indirectly), address use and history, etc.


Top 50 recent answers are included