Return to Answer

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

The fee is simply the difference between input amount and output amount. There is no correspondence between individual inputs and individual outputs when there are multiple of either - the notion of fees coming from specifically one of several inputs simply has no meaning in the Bitcoin network.

The Ordinals project makes an arbitrary assignment according to its own off-chain rules. This is based on the ordering of inputs and outputs in the transaction - but this order has no meaning in the Bitcoin network and can be random. I guess you would have to manually construct a transaction that makes this order correspond to the external Ordinals rules you want to apply.

However maybe the damage is already done - maybe the Ordinals project's reassignment of the NFT has already caused it to be transferred out of your control?

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

The fee is simply the difference between input amount and output amount. There is no correspondence between individual inputs and individual outputs when there are multiple of either - the notion of fees coming from specifically one of several inputs simply has no meaning in the Bitcoin network.

The Ordinals project makes an arbitrary assignment according to its own off-chain rules. This is based on the ordering of inputs and outputs in the transaction - but this order has no meaning in the Bitcoin network and can be random. I guess you would have to manually construct a transaction that makes this order correspond to the external Ordinals rules you want to apply.

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

The fee is simply the difference between input amount and output amount. There is no correspondence between individual inputs and individual outputs when there are multiple of either - the notion of fees coming from one or other input simply has no meaning in the Bitcoin network.

The Ordinals project makes an arbitrary assignment according to its own off-chain rules. This is based on the ordering of inputs and outputs in the transaction - but this order has no meaning in the Bitcoin network and can be random.

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

The fee is simply the difference between input amount and output amount. There is no correspondence between individual inputs and individual outputs when there are multiple of either - the notion of fees coming from specifically one of several inputs simply has no meaning in the Bitcoin network.

The Ordinals project makes an arbitrary assignment according to its own off-chain rules. This is based on the ordering of inputs and outputs in the transaction - but this order has no meaning in the Bitcoin network and can be random. I guess you would have to manually construct a transaction that makes this order correspond to the external Ordinals rules you want to apply.

However maybe the damage is already done - maybe the Ordinals project's reassignment of the NFT has already caused it to be transferred out of your control?

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

is there any way to dictate which UTXO the fees come from?

Some wallets have a feature named "coin control".

The fee is simply the difference between input amount and output amount. There is no correspondence between individual inputs and individual outputs when there are multiple of either - the notion of fees coming from one or other input simply has no meaning in the Bitcoin network.

The Ordinals project makes an arbitrary assignment according to its own off-chain rules. This is based on the ordering of inputs and outputs in the transaction - but this order has no meaning in the Bitcoin network and can be random.