1

I'm creating a Bitcoin based lottery application. An entry into the lottery is a transaction spending 1BTC.

If someone guesses some arbitrary value correctly, they can claim the entry and send this 1 Btc to an address they control.

I wish to have functionality as follows: if no one guesses the correct number after 100 blocks, then I can claim it as the operator of the lottery.

Can I do this via: Entry transaction IF CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY payable to a correct guess ELSE Payable to my operator public key END

Then when I try to spend this entry transaction, I set the nLockTime to the current block.

Throughout I set all the sequence numbers to 0xFFF... So that the transactions are mined.

1 Answer 1

0

Yes, you can use OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY to make a transaction output unspendable for a certain number of blocks. However, you can't use it directly in an if-else block as you have described. When OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY executes, it doesn't place a result value on the stack. It either throws an error (invalidating the transaction attempting to spend the output), or continues executing as if nothing happened.

To create a transaction as you describe, you will need to use multisig, such that one party can spend the transaction as soon as the correct number is provided (input to a hash function, I presume?), OR you can spend it back to yourself after the lock time expires. This is basically how the lightning network works. You should check out Lightning Networks Part II: Hashed Timelock Contracts (HTLCs)

3
  • Thanks for the info. On the BIP Page Peter Todd suggests a script similar to mine though, right? github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki
    – Tom Taylor
    Commented May 12, 2016 at 21:16
  • Yes, his examples are similar. Just remember that OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is a consequence of a condition, not the condition itself. The condition is the 0 or 1 at the end of his example redemption scripts. That's what determines if OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is called.
    – Jestin
    Commented May 12, 2016 at 21:33
  • Great, thanks. Will come back here with any further questions.
    – Tom Taylor
    Commented May 12, 2016 at 21:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.