Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with sighash
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 121614
1
vote
Accepted
I cannot broadcast my raw tx (P2PKH) on testnet: Signature must be zero for failed CHECK(MUL...
The modified transaction you're hashing (raw_tx_string) is missing the output script (scriptPubKey_out), which is why the signature then fails to verify.
- 10.4k
1
vote
Accepted
What's the reason for the scriptCode format for a P2WPKH? (BIP 143)
Maybe one of the authors of BIP143 will correct me, but I think this was done to simplify the implementation in Bitcoin Core.
If you look at the code for P2WPKH validation, you can see it actually bui …
- 10.4k