Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with validation
Search options not deleted
user 139306
1
vote
1
answer
82
views
Is there a particular order in which transaction inputs are checked for script validity?
For example, if we wanted to add incremental metadata for a given transaction during validation -- for example, "sum the nValues for inputs that are related ways x, y, z - but do it on the fly so we don't … impair validation speed." …
- 321
2
votes
Is there a particular order in which transaction inputs are checked for script validity?
Inputs are not necessarily evaluated for script validity in any particular order. Indeed, today certain calls to CheckInputScripts() will push the created CScriptCheck objects onto a vector (pvChecks) …
- 321