Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with sending
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 7272
1
vote
"Relay fee" error when sending funds from one account to another
You need to increase your transaction fee to meet the minimums required by the node you are connected to. If you use a fee below that, the node (and other nodes on the network) will refuse to broadcas …
- 17.3k
1
vote
Transactions with multiple input UTXOs and multiple output UTXOs
This kind of statement does not hold.
As RedGrittyBrick's answer mentions, bitcoin has no real concept of people, or individual contributions. Multiple inputs in a transaction might be controlled by …
- 17.3k
3
votes
Recipient has “not received” the Bitcoin I sent, but the transaction is confirmed
The receiving address has received and already spent the coins, which results in a 0 balance.
The receiver should still be able to see the transaction in their wallet history, if they are using a con …
- 17.3k
28
votes
Recipient has “not received” the Bitcoin I sent, but the transaction is confirmed
If a transaction is not found, it has almost certainly not been mined - in this case, you should aim to rebroadcast the transaction instead of sending a new one. … It is possible that the transaction has actually been broadcast and just not picked up by the explorer yet, so sending a second one may result in a double payment. …
- 17.3k