All Questions
4 questions
4
votes
1
answer
411
views
Is there an economic incentive to use P2WSH over P2TR?
As I understand, p2pkh and p2sh are nothing better than p2wpkh and p2wsh, other than compatibilty.
After taproot, p2wpkh is also nothing better than p2tr, other than compatibilty(no economic incentive ...
- 445
1
vote
2
answers
195
views
Inscriptions with size less than 10Kb were seemingly possible before taproot, why did they become popular only now?
In 2017 SegWit soft fork introduced consensus limit on script size MAX_STANDARD_P2WSH_SCRIPT_SIZE=10000. With P2WSH, one could seemingly use the same script structure ("envelope") OP_FALSE ...
- 253
7
votes
1
answer
344
views
Will P2TR make P2WSH obsolete?
Assuming users have upgraded their wallets to handle P2TR outputs and trust the validation rules of P2TR, would there be any advantage of using P2WSH over P2TR?
- 829
7
votes
1
answer
659
views
Support for P2WSH-wrapped P2TR addresses
Given that Taproot addresses use a new SegWit version and a new address encoding (bech32m), it's reasonable to expect a transition from the ecosystem to this new address version similar to what we saw ...
- 308