1

In the 'tx messages' section for protocol rules we have

  1. Each output value, as well as the total, must be in legal money range
  1. For each input, if the referenced output does not exist (e.g. never existed or has already been spent), reject this transaction

If my understanding is correct, rule 4 will confirm 0 <= output, sum of outputs <= 21,000,000, and rule 12 is checking that each input is in the UTXO set. I am having a hard time seeing why rule 4 is necessary, it seems like other rules - such as rule 12 - would already invalidate a transaction that was not in legal range. No one could ever have > 21,000,000 bitcoin so there could never be utxos for more 21,000,000.

Also, where can I find the code for these checks in the source code.

1
  • There's no real reason for the rule to exist, other than that there had been an integer overflow incident in the past.
    – Claris
    Mar 22, 2021 at 16:04

1 Answer 1

2

If the output value was only constrained by their sum being smaller than that of the inputs, you could e.g. set one output to a negative value and create new money in a second output.

You can also do more creative stuff: I think the rule might have been introduced as a response to the value overflow incident on 2010-08-15. A transaction in a (now invalid) block at height 74638 created outputs that were so large that their sum overflowed into the permitted range. The transaction created 2×92.2 billion bitcoins.

The code fix for the value overflow incident can be found in this commit. The code for this rule can be found in src/consensus/tx_check.cpp. The CheckTransaction() function checks consensus rules that don't require any knowledge of the current chainstate.

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.