New answers tagged doublespend
1
No, there is no such problem. When BCH developers thought about introduction replay protection, they first agreed on the OP_RETURN-based one. Then they changed their minds and decided to use the better SIGHASH_FORKID-based one (see details about BCH replay protection).
Their first replay protection wasn't removed. It expired with block 530,000. After that ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
Related Tags
doublespend × 248transactions × 53
blockchain × 28
bitcoin-core × 24
unconfirmed-transactions × 19
security × 16
confirmations × 16
attack × 14
blockchain-fork × 13
bitcoind × 12
mining-theory × 12
majority-attack × 11
proof-of-work × 10
ripple × 9
zero-confirmation × 9
utxo × 8
transaction-verification × 8
wallet × 7
whitepaper × 7
transaction-fees × 6
electrum × 6
fraud × 6
orphaned-blocks × 6
consensus × 5
race-attack × 5